Science communication – the Renaissance touch

In a post-truth world how do we bring scientific discussions to a public audience?

It’s an important question, particularly with the worrying trends of dismissing inconvenient science fact as ‘fake news’ or to being fed self-reinforcing extreme views through current social media news feed algorithms. Science communication itself also requires a recognition of the issues it faces and needs to revamp its methods to be appropriate to the times.

Today more than ever we are relying on technological developments to help us understand and address the challenges facing our planet and environment. It is critical to fuelling smart new ideas that ensure our society’s vibrancy. And it is critical that we can actively communicate the wonder and potential benefits of these developments and the benefits of the earth’s rich resources to its people. We need to be able to offer opportunities that are inspired by and that inspire the understanding of science. We need to make science personally relevant on every level.

So how can science messages be more effectively communicated in a world where competition for the attention of the public is at an all-time high, and where in any head to head competition to grab attention science issues are likely to lose out compared to political instabilities, economic downturn and celebrity prurience?

As I’ve previously written art can be an important tool in science communication. The combination of left and right-side brain stimulation was clearly at the basis of the Renaissance and can lead to a powerful non-verbal and deeply resonating mode of messaging.

As a scientist myself, I know that collaboration between art and science can generate debate, understanding, new knowledge and ideas that synergise both fields. It can open up new ways of interpreting the world around us through inspiration, exploration, creativity and collaboration.

But I’m now going to move onto music, or more specifically music festivals, as an instrument of science communication.

I recently participated in a panel discussion on environmental and health issues associated with meat consumption at the WOMADelaide festival as part of the Planet Talks series.

The musical line-up for WOMADelaide this year was as impressive as always, featuring over 75 acts and music aficionados such as Sona Jobarteh, Dona Onete, Fat Freddy’s Drop, BCUC (AKA Bantu Continua Uhuru Consciousness), Angélique Kidjo, John Butler Trio, Christine & The Queens, to name a few.

So what is the opportunity here for science messaging at this type of event – well as it turns out – quite a bit, especially when there’s an audience of over 95,000 over a four-day long weekend.

IMG_7490.jpeg
on a panel discussion at WOMADelaide 2019, ‘Less Meat Less Heat: is the elephant in the room a cow?’

A number of key topics were presented and debated as part of the Planet Talks series including: The Magic of Mushrooms, A Mycelial path to saving the planet; The Fight for the Bight Against Big Oil; Adani, Cold Wars and the National Interest.

For almost all the talks it was standing room only with hundreds choosing to engage and participate in panel discussions.

So why is this forum successful?

Well first people have time on their hands. WOMADelaide participants tend to go for the whole weekend and so attending an interesting discussion during the middle of the day before the big evening acts come on is time well spent.

People are also relaxed having already got into the groove of the weekend and are therefore more likely to be open to new concepts and discussion points.

The topics were also well pitched to the audience with many focussing on environmental issues but there were several of a purely ‘did you know’ science type discussions.

For our panel discussion ‘Less Meat, Less Heat: is the elephant in the room a cow?’ the audience was well informed and responsive and respectful of the different views expressed from going vegan to consuming meat from animals raised in a sustainable way. The tautology of issues between feeding the world to consuming less meat as part of a healthy western diet were well versed.

A forum like Planet Talks gives an opportunity for face-to-face discussion of important topics facing society with experts and industry during and after the talks. They also provide an opportunity to  ask questions and engage with fellow audiences members on a topics that effects everyone.

So bring on science/art/music comms methods – science effects every part of our lives, including our culture, so why shouldn’t it be talked about in all forums.

Read the Adelaidenow review of the Planet Talks 2019 


Update

20190311_120331_IMG_3511
WOMAD Earth Talk panelists – Less meat, less heat – Is the elephant in the room really a cow – with (l-r) Cecile Godde (CSIRO), Angie Plummer (Less Meat, Less Heat), Deb Tribe (ABC) and Matthew Evans.

Following this Planet Talk at WOMAD – Less Meat Less Heat – Is the elephant in the room really a cow? – I was contacted by Matthew Evans to review his recently published book ‘On eating meat’ read the review below which features on the cover.

‘Compelling, insightful, well-researched and highly readable, Matthew Evans’ new book On Eating Meat presents an honest and challenging disposition of the livestock industry and the ethical and planetary issues surrounding our consumption of meat.

The narrative style draws you in, but don’t be fooled, this is a bold and confronting treatise questioning the animal welfare, environmental impact and human health consequences of intensive livestock farming – the very methods that have allowed cheap meat to be brought to our supermarket shelves. But for all our major cheap meat options there are problems, from cattle feed lots, through sow matricide to the sheer number of chicken lives sacrificed to keep up with our growing demand for cheap protein.

And don’t think for one minute those who choose to forsake meat are given an easy ride. Our bipolar, and sometimes hypocritical, relationship with animals is highlighted, where we keep some as pets but eat others, and the typical animal carnage involved in growing vegetables is fully exposed.

In spite of all the emotion laden topics, Evans finds a middle way through the debates. As a former vegetarian, chef and food critic, and now lifestyle farmer, he also brings his personal experiences to the issues and highlights the important cultural and gastronomic dimensions of eating meat that have probably prevented veganism from taking off in a bigger way.

Challenging our senses and morals along the way, Evans looks at a number of alternative meat sourcing and consumption futures. Vegetarian, vegan, carnivore, flexitarian, or even, as Evans promotes – ethical omnivore – eating less meat but spending more to make sure it is ethically and more sustainably sourced.

Ultimately this book equips the reader with the knowledge to get beyond the entrenched opinions of its topic area, and allows us to decide whether and what type of meat we wish to consume, and with what consequences for the future.’

2 thoughts on “Science communication – the Renaissance touch

Add yours

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: